GIS for Environmental Modeling
| Geog 479/559 Spring 2011 | M W 2:00pm-3:20pm |
| Instructor: Ling Bian
Office: 120 Wilkeson Quad Office Hours: M W 3:30pm-4:30pm |
145H Wilkeson Lab: T 11:00am-12:20pm or W 6:30pm-7:50pm, Wilkeson 145C TA: Sam Copeland |
Advanced weighing of GIS layers
Issue: Modeling habitat of Red Squirrel in Mt. Graham.
Factors:
a. Topography:
elevation
slope
aspect (E-W)
aspect (N-S)
b. Vegetation:
land
cover
canopy closure
food
productivity
tree dbh
distance to openness (road network
and canopy closure)
Data: DEM, vegetation cover, roads
200 presence cells (observed)
200 absence cells (randomly
located)
Logistic Regression:
The dependent variable
is dichotomous
The independent variables can be numerical or categorical
Dependent
variable (binary): presence or absence
Independent variables(14):
1.elevation 2.slope 3.aspect N-S 4.aspect E-W
5.distance to opening
6-8.food productivity, 3 categories, presence or absence for each variable
9-11.canopy closure, 3 categories, presence or absence for each variable
12-14. dbh, 3 categories, presence or absence for each variable
Statistical Testing:
t-test for continuous independent variables:
mean of the indep var at presence sites = mean of absence sites
C2-test for categorical independent variables:
distribution of the indep var at presence sites = absence
aspect N-S is not significant
Data Partition:
Data partition for model development vs. validation
75%
of sample are used to develop model, 150 presence sites, 150 absence sites
25% of sample
are used for model validation, 50 presence sites, 50 absence sites
The Logistic Model:
Y = 0.002ele - 0.228slope
+ 0.685canopy1 + 0.443canopy2
+ 0.481canopy3 + 0.009aspectE-W
1
P(Y) = --------------, the
probability of hawks presence
1 + exp(-Y)
Accuracy Assessment:
decide a
cut-off value for P, convention: 0.5
convert logistic regression
output (P) into suitable/unsuitable
cell value < cut-off
= unsuitable, cell value >= cut-off = suitable
Error Matrix for 150 presence
sites and 150 absence sites
82% correct for
presence sites,
76% correct for absence sites
Model Validation:
Error Matrix for the 50 presence and
50 absence sites
74% correct for presence sites, 68%
for absence sites
GIS Overlay: