World Civilizations 112
Lecture Outlines
European Nation-States and the New Imperialism
The Crimean War (1854-1856)
The Russians wanted access to the Mediterranean all year round (their seaport
in Murmansk in the far northwest was frozen for more than half a year).
On a flimsy pretext, they went to war with the Ottoman Turks. Most of the
fighting took place on the Crimean Peninsula that gave the war its name.
Great Britain and France decided that its was in their strategic interest
to deny Russia access to the Mediterranean and sided with the Turks. The
Russians were badly beaten and forced to sign an unfavorable treaty with
the Turks. Their reputation for invincibility was shattered but so was
the Congress system that had preserved peace in Europe for forty years.
Henceforth, the forces of nationalism were to gradually draw Europe over
a half-century of time into a general war (World War I).
Italian Unification
-
Garibaldi and the Wars against Austrians
-
Giuseppe Mazzini and Giussepe Garibaldi sought to drive the Austrians out
of Italy. They failed but frightened more moderate Italians to seek a safer
alternative. In May, 1860, Garibaldi landed in Sicily with more than a
thousand troops and captured Palermo. He then drove north until he had
conquered Naples. At that point, Cavour rushed troops south to confront
Garibaldi (next paragraphs).
-
Piedmont (the Kingdom of Sardinia)
-
Piedmont was discussed several times in this course. It was a province
of Italy that formed the southeastern border with France. Piedmont was
a liberal state with ambitions to dominate northern Italy, or if possible,
all of it. So, Piedmont was constantly at war with Austria who acted as
the hegemonic power in Italy. Piedmont, however, was liberal in the nineteenth
century terms but not radical (socialist or in favor of income redistribution).
Victor Immanuel II chose Count Cavour in 1852 to actually run his government.
-
Count Cavour, Prime Minister of Piedmont
-
Cavour believed that, if the Italians proved themselves to be efficient
and economically progressive, they would gain the support of France and
England in the conflict with Austria. So, Cavour worked for free trade,
railway construction, credit expansion and agricultural improvements. He
fostered the Nationalist Society which had chapters across Italy. Cavour
jointed France and Great Britain in the Crimean War against Russia. In
1859, Piedmont and Austria went to war once again with the support of France.
This time, Piedmont finally won a major battle but were then deserted by
the French. Nevertheless, Piedmont won Lombardy but Veneto (Venice and
surrounding province) remained in Austrian hands. Shortly thereafter, Parma,
Modena, Tuscany and Romagna voted to unite with Piedmont.
-
Victor Immanuel II, King of Italy
-
It was at that point that Garibaldi invaded Sicily and marched up to Naples.
Garibaldi's nationalism won out over his republicanism and he accepted
the domination of Piedmont. In 1860, the southern Italian state voted to
unite with the northern state and Italy was born. Victor Emmanuel II was
proclaimed King of Italy in March, 1861. Three months later, Cavour died.
The new state had never been unified since the days of the Roman Empire
and most Italians identified with their region but only weakly with the
country. This led to sectional as well as economic politics that, forevermore,
were a model of complexity and frustration.
German Unification
-
Bismarck
-
Otto von Bismarck, a son of minor nobility in eastern German, was so conservative
that the Prussian King in 1848 found him too far right! After he completed
university education, he retired to his father's estate and then gradually
entered pan German politics by being elected first to his provincial diet
(Parliament) and then to the Frankfort Diet in 1859. Later he served as
the Prussian ambassador to Saint Petersburg (capital of Russia) and then
to Paris.
The King appointed him minister president (prime minister) in 1862.
Bismarck immediately began to move against the Prussian parliament. Contending
that the state constitution permitted him to operate on the basis of previously
passed taxes, he ignored the Parliament in raising taxes and running the
government. In 1863, new elections sustained the liberals. Bismarck set
about uniting Germany through the conservative institutions of the monarchy.
He pursued a unification policy that excluded Austria. In 1864, he went
to war with Denmark with the support of Austria. Defeated, the Danish were
forced to part with two German speaking provinces, Schleswig and Holstein.
Bismarck concluded several alliances with France and Italy and then
went to war with Austria which the Prussian Army defeated in what became
known as the Seven Weeks War. In 1867, Hanover, Hesse, Nassau and the City
of Frankfort were annexed. Prussian became the undisputed leader of the
German federation.
-
The Franco-Prussian War (1870-1871)
-
Finally, Bismarck cleverly provoked Napoleon III into war with Prussia.
The efficient Prussian Army beat the French easily and, surrounding Paris,
forced the French to capitulate in 1871. Germany won the border provinces
of Alsace and Lorraine. They became one of the causes of World War I. It
was even more important for Germany that the remaining states of southern
Germany joined Prussia. A German Empire emerged under the leadership of
King William I. The new central power replaced the largely weak and ineffectual
Austrians. The conflict between the French and the Germans was to dominated
Europe from 1870 to 1945. One result of the defeat in war was the abdication
of Napoleon III and the birth of the Third Republic.
Napoleon III (1851-1870)
Supported by the French Catholic Church, property owners and businessmen,
Napoleon suppressed the liberals in every way he could following his "coup
de tat" (military takeover of the state) in 1851. From the late 1850's
on, Napoleon III became somewhat more liberal as his foreign policy became
increasingly unsuccessful. Between 1861 and 1867, he supported Archduke
Maximilian's seizure of the government of Mexico using French troops. The
Mexicans overthrew the French government in 1867 and executed the Archduke.
Then, Napoleon lost the war with Prussia. At that point, the French had
finished with him and he had to flee to England.
Monarchists dominated the Assembly which met in Versailles in 1871.
They negotiated a settlement with Germany that required France to pay a
large indemnity and surrender Alsace-Lorraine to Germany. Paris resented
this settlement and on March 26, 1971 they elected a new municipal government
called the Paris Commune. The Assembly reacted by having the French army
besiege Paris and kill 20,000 Parisians. However, the monarchists dominating
the Assembly were divided between those who supported the House of Bourbon
and those who supported the House of Orleans. In 1875, they reluctantly
settled upon a republican form of government that became known as the Third
Republic.
The Third Republic (1871-1945)
The Third Republic consisted of a chamber of deputies elected by universal
manhood suffrage, a senate chosen indirectly and a president elected by
the two houses. Thus, it resembled the original design of the American
constitution before it was democratized. The greatest trauma of the republic
was the so-called 'Dreyfus Affair'. Captain Alfred Dreyfus of the French
Army was Jewish. He was accused of spying for the Germans. After Dreyfus
was convicted in a court-martial, military secrets continued to flow to
Germany. A new head of French counter-intelligence reexamined the file
and found evidence of forgery in documents supposedly signed by Dreyfus.
A different officer was implicated but acquitted of all charges by a military
court. The officer who discovered the forgeries was transferred to a distant
post.
Emil Zola, a novelist, wrote an article entitled "I accuse" in which
he identified the army, the French Catholic Church, political conservatives
and anti-Semitic newspapers as being in a conspiracy to make Dreyfus a
scapegoat for something he had not done. In a new military trial, Dreyfus
was again convicted of treason. The President of France pardoned him and
a civilian court in 1906 set aside the results of both previous military
trials. The officer corps remained vehemently anti-Semitic on the whole.
It was this corps that sided with Adolf Hitler in the Vichy Government.
The left united against this coalition of conservative forces. The political
conflict thus started over Dreyfus was to persist for the entire twentieth
century and lent a bitter tone to French politics. It also fatally weakened
the Third Republic in the conflict with Germany.
The Formation of the Dual Monarchy in the Hapsburg Empire
The revolts of 1848 in the Hapsburg Empire simply served to reinforce the
reactionary politics of the regime. The Emperor Franz Joseph(1848-1916)
sought to impose a centralized administration on the many different ethnic
groups that comprised the Empire by using German-speaking Austrians Defeated
n 1859 and 1866 and driven out of Italy, the Emperor was forced to come
to terms with the most powerful other ethnic group in the Empire; namely,
the Hungarians. The compromise of 1867 transformed the Hapsburg Empire
into a dual monarchy in which Hungary had nearly total autonomy except
for the common monarchy, foreign policy and army. This created great resentment
by the Czechs, Ruthenians, Rumanians, and Serbo-Croations outside of Austria
itself. Thereafter, they sought the same level of political recognition
as the Hungarians. Finally, the Emperor dissolved Parliament and ruled
by decree around the turn of the twentieth century. This feeling extended
throughout central Europe and virtually everyone outside of Austria itself,
the new Germany and Russia wanted to have an independent state. Ultimately,
this wave of nationalism gave rise to patriots who resorted to force to
liberate their homelands from foreign domination. This led, of course,
directly to terrorism because the dominant states were too strong militarily
to be openly confronted on the field of battle.
The Reforms of Alexander II (1855-1881)
Following the defeat of the Russian Army in the Crimean Peninsula and an
unfavorable treaty concluding the war, the new Emperor of Russia, Alexander
II determined that he was going to restructure Russian society along more
modern lines. In 1856, he announced his intention to abolish serfdom in
the Russian Empire. This elicited enormous opposition from the landlords
and it took him five years to actually promulgate a long statute ending
serfdom. Serfdom was a legal system in which farmers were bound to work
the land for landlords who could extract labor and part of the harvest
from them. The long struggle with the landlords resulted in a compromise
in which the peasants were forced to pay back the landlords for their losses
due to emancipation over a period of 49 years. This led to endless disputes
and much resentment on all sides. Finally, following the defeat by the
Japanese navy in 1905 and beset by uprisings, the government grudgingly
cancelled the remaining debts five years ahead of schedule. Abolition of
serfdom required the reorganization of both local government and the judicial
system. The reforms were under-funded and the tsarist government remained
the only effective power in Russia. The courts were reformed with better
results although the legal system was far from meeting western standards
of impartiality.
A Russian living in exile, Alexander Herzen, published a newspaper called
The Bell that set forth reformist proposals. Some students formed a revolutionary
group based on these ideas and hundreds of them took to the countryside
in the early 1870's to propagandize among the peasants. The peasants were
distrustful and turned all of the students over to the police. They were
given light sentences by a judge who felt that a display of mercy might
lessen public support for them. The movement split up and a radical offshoot
assassinated Alexander II in 1881.
Many were convinced that the monarchy would never reform Russian and
a revolutionary underground gradually formed throughout the country. Alexander
III (1881 - 1894) confirmed the pessimism concerning the monarchy. He strengthened
the secret police (the 'Cheka') and increased press censorship. Russian
festered and slid towards revolution.
Towards Democracy in Great Britain
In 1867, a Second Reform Act passed Parliament at the urging of the conservative
Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli (the first had been passed in 1832). It
increased the number of voters from 1.4 million to 2.5 million from one
year to the next. The election of 1868, however, disappointed Disraeli
who had hoped for the support of British working people enfranchised the
previous year by his government and the liberals won. Gladstone introduced
competitive examinations in the British Civil Service, abolished the purchase
of officer's commissions and made the British government responsible for
establishing and running elementary schools. Disraeli succeeded Gladstone
in office in 1874 and passed the Public Health Act of 1875 that consolidated
and extended previous sanitary legislation and also passed the Artisans
Dwelling Act which provided for public housing.
The major issue of the 1880's was Ireland. From the 1860's onward, Irish
nationalists sought Irish independence from the United Kingdom. In 1885,
a united bloc of Irish members of Parliament held the balance of power
between the Conservatives and Liberals. In 1885, Gladstone announced support
for Irish home rule. Parnell, the leader of the Irish Parliamentary bloc
supported Gladstone but enough members of his own Liberal party deserted
him so that the Conservatives elected Lord Salisbury as Prime Minister.
He sought to mollify the Irish with public works and administrative reform
but met with only marginal success. In 1892, a second bill on home rule
for Ireland was passed but was defeated in the House of Lords. The liberal
ministry passed a third home rule bill but its implementation was postponed
during World War I. Basically, the Irish question split the liberals into
two warring camps and prevented them from effectively carrying the banner
of reform. In the vacuum created, a new Party called the Labor Party gradually
accumulated political power.
The New Imperialism
The Europeans reached the pinnacle of their power in the world during the
period 1870 to 1945. North and South America were populated mostly by European
peoples. So were Australia and New Zealand. Until this period, most of
Asia (with exception of India) and Africa had gone their own ways. The
Middle Eastern regions were dominated by the Ottoman and Safavid Empires.
But, during the first half of this period from 1870 to 1945, most of these
areas were absorbed into European Empires or were dominated by them. The
expansion spread over 10 million square miles and 150 million people. The
dictionary definition of Imperialism is useful in evaluating this period:
"The policy of extending a nation's authority by territorial acquisition
or by the establishment of economic and political hegemony over other nations."
Usually this began by European countries making investments in foreign
countries and supporting these investments by arrangements with local potentates.
If these arrangements did not work, the European power extended military
aid and, if this did not work either, by outright annexation.
Motives for Imperialism
Lenin's interpretation of this process was that "Imperialism is the monopoly
stage of capitalism." According to Lenin, competition inevitably leads
to the elimination of inefficient capitalist and to the creation of monopolies.
Running out of profitable markets at home, monopolists expand into foreign
markets and that leads to imperialism. The facts do not support the argument
which is logical on its face. Only a small percentage of British and European
investments were made in under-developed countries. Most were made in Europe
itself or in America. Often new investments that were made in the global
south were made in countries that were not colonies. Another fact that
was inconvenient for the socialists was the repeated introduction of new
products and new techniques of production that produced new companies and
new competition. Another argument for the economic roots of imperialism
was that the global south produced the raw materials for the industrial
state in the United Kingdom and Europe. All of the imperial powers were
forced to rely on sources not under imperial control. Nor did the colonies
constitute a significant market for the home countries. In the end, most
imperial governments spent more money on their colonies than they received
in privileged access.
Some arguments were put forward that the European peoples possessed
a superior culture and that they had a responsibility to civilize backward
nations. Few people were persuaded by these arguments although many people
of the time shared the underlying assumption of European superiority. Religious
groups in Europe had always argued that conversion to Christianity was
a duty. Some thought that the colonies were a way of diverting public attention
from problems at home or for places to settle surplus population. In fact,
most European immigrants went to North and South America where there was
empty land to be settled due to the eradication of Native American populations.
Basically, many Europeans viewed the holding of vast lands and peoples
overseas as a matter of national prestige with England being regarded as
the prime example. Many were envious of the UK and the Russians, Japanese
and even the Americans emulated the British in acquiring colonies. What
did occur as a result of this period of expansion was that European conflicts
inevitably became world conflicts. Another more enduring result was that
nationalism spread by example all across Asia and resulted in the emergence
of Asian nation states in the Twentieth Century and liberation movements
(but not really nationalism) in Africa.
Return to the Table of Contents.