@list L0 {mso-list-template-ids:-1044196604 -463719076 1787618586 -621910346 - 1068087144 1128977690 -159225742 1415220028 222957892 -730050248;} @list L9 {mso-list-template-ids:-1442123858 2049966110 -980679914 -1257111276 - 897660202 795643506 997766554 1353242006 2103226640 869726686;}

Geography 594:

Geographic Information and Society

Spring 2007

Instructor:

David M. Mark: Web page , Email: dmark@buffalo.edu

Geographic Information and Society examines the interrelationships between GIS and the political, economic, legal, social, cultural, spatial, and institutional structures of society. Two general perspectives are reviewed: The institutional perspective focuses on GIS implementation processes and benefit/cost measures in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and equity, as well as on theories and methods for determining how spatial information influences land and policy decisions. The critical social theory perspective focuses on a critical analysis of the effects of GIS technologies on individuals and groups, including issues of representation, alternative modes of reasoning, and differential access to technology. Both theoretical and applied aspects of GIS and Society are reviewed in the context of the two general perspectives.

FACTS ABOUT THE COURSES

SPRING 2003 INFORMATION: GEO 594

TIMETABLE:

CREDIT HOURS: 3

GRADING: The grade will be based on a research paper, a class presentation, and class participation.

Draft Course Outline



§       Harley, J.B., 1989. Deconstructing the Map. Cartographica 26(2): 1-20.

§       Sheppard, E., 1995. GIS and Society: Towards a research Agenda. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22 (1): 5-16.

§       Sheppard, E., Couclelis, H., Graham, S., Harrington, J. W., and Onsrud, H., 1999, Geographies of the information society. International Journal of geographical Information Science 13(8), 797-823.

§       Harley, J.B., 1990. Cartography, Ethics, and Social Theory. Cartographica 27(2): 1-23.

§       Pickles, J., 1991. Geography, G.I.S. and the Surveillant Society. Applied Geography Conference.


§       Pinto, J. K., and Onsrud, H. J., Sharing geographic information across organizational boundaries: A research framework. 44-64.

§       Calkins, H. W., and Weatherbe, R., Taxonomy of spatial data sharing. 65-75

§       Kevany, M. J., A proposed structure for observing data sharing. 76-100.


§       Dickinson, H. J., and Calkins, H. W., 1988. The economic evaluation of implementing a GIS. International Journal of geographical Information Systems 2(4), 307-327.

§       Calkins, H. W., and Obermeyer, N. J., 1991. Taxonomy for surveying the use and value of geographical information. International Journal of geographical Information Systems 5(3), 341-351.

§       Onsrud, H. J., and Calkins, H., 1993. Research Initiative 4: Use and value of geographic information. Closing Report, NCGIA, Santa Barbara, CA.




§       Winchell, D. G., Goodman, J. M., Jett, S. C., and Henderson, M. L., 1989. Geographic research on native Americans. In: G. L. Gaile and C. J. Wilmott, editors, Geography in America, Columbus: Merrill Publishing Company, pp. 239-255.





§       "Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s" by Nadine Schuurman

§       "Is GIS for Women? Refections on the critical discourse in the 1990s" by Mei-Po Kwan







Web sites related to the course:


Last updated on February 6 2007


[ University at Buffalo | UB Geography Department ]